[development] New project vocabularies

[Ryan Cross]

THAT sounds *much* cooler (and more useful) than having another vocabulary
for modules to try slotting themselves into.

+++1 for implementing that instead.

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Nathaniel Catchpole <
catch56 at googlemail.com> wrote:

> In the redesign discussions, we'd discussed having nodereferences between
> case studies, site recipes and projects for this purpose rather than tags.
> That way, people documenting how particular types of sites are built could
> show which modules they used - as opposed to project owners saying 'I think
> this might be useful for'. You could then show showcases and site recipes
> next to modules, and modules next to showcases and site recipes in a
> structured way (and with some data munging, get aggregate data if needed).
> Was this discussed as an option?
>
> Nat
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20090213/dca1714c/attachment.htm