[development] An alternative to common thinking in 5-> 6migration

Larry Garfield larry at garfieldtech.com
Wed Mar 11 14:01:26 UTC 2009

On Wednesday 11 March 2009 7:45:14 am Marcel Partap wrote:
> > Previous posters brought up arguments, but you obviously did not
> > understand them.

> there was no argument i am aware of, and none of those strike me as
> real compelling evidence quality restriction would be a bad idea.

Did it ever occur to you that as someone proposing a new idea it's up to you 
to present evidence why it's needed, not up to us to provide evidence that 
it's not?  The onus is on you to show that your idea would improve the 
development process.  After 100 or so messages in related threads, you have 
not.  Please don't waste any more electrons repeating the same thing over and 
over.  You had a suggestion, it was rejected, move along to something else.  
Right now all you're doing is wasting everyone's all-too-limited time, time 
that would be better spent reviewing patches.

Larry Garfield
larry at garfieldtech.com

More information about the development mailing list