[development] Module proposal: Site Component Lister

[James Benstead]

Nancy - just found http://drupal.org/project/sitedoc which must have been
what you were directing me to - thanks! :)

--Jim
--
My IM and Skype details are at http://state68.com/contact


On 28 June 2011 15:44, James Benstead <james.benstead at gmail.com> wrote:

> Apologies, Nancy: I've posted module proposals to this list before but not
> for a while - I'm guessing that the protocol must have changed.
>
> Thank you for the link you provided, but it provides a "Page not found"
> error. Is there a specific mailing list that I should post module proposals
> to? Could you direct me to that, please?
>
> --Jim
> --
> My IM and Skype details are at http://state68.com/contact
>
>
> On 28 June 2011 15:17, Ms. Nancy Wichmann <nan_wich at bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>> This is not about Drupal core development.
>>
>> Check http://drupal.org/project/site_doc
>>
>> *Nancy*
>>
>> Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. -- Dr. Martin L.
>> King, Jr.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* James Benstead <james.benstead at gmail.com>
>> *To:* Drupal developer mailing list <development at drupal.org>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 28, 2011 10:02 AM
>> *Subject:* [development] Module proposal: Site Component Lister
>>
>> I'm thinking of writing a D6 module that will provide a breakdown of the
>> components that make up the D6 site the module is running on. The purpose of
>> of the module would be to enable people learning Drupal to see how a given
>> Drupal site has been put together: what modules and themes have been used,
>> how they have been configured, etc.
>>
>> I've had a very brief chat about this with one other Drupal user on
>> Twitter who commented on the potential security problems this might raise,
>> but from my point of view this shouldn't be an issue as the module would be
>> "opt-in" and, more importantly, security through obscurity is rarely a good
>> idea. I'm not an expert on Drupal security, however.
>>
>> Does a module of this type seem workable and, perhaps more to the point,
>> desirable?
>>
>> --Jim
>> --
>> My IM and Skype details are at http://state68.com/contact
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20110628/ce3b2676/attachment-0001.html