I really don't mind any good idea for the united aggregation front lol. Question is, should we waste our time updating the aggregator module or to simply choose a new base module, alter it to fit, and push to include it in core?
<br><br>Let's talk about it more so I can understand what you two have in mind. I'll go over the syndication group and try to understand what you're proposing. Khalid, Boris, I hope you don't mind me contacting you on the side so we can discuss this. Anyone who has ideas or suggestions on this issue, please contact me and we can talk about it as well.
<br><br>Thanks.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 4/29/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Boris Mann</b> <<a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">email@example.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On 4/28/07, Khalid Baheyeldin <<a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">email@example.com</a>> wrote:<br><br>> Now, your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to modularize<br>> the node creation from feeds and make that a generic API.
<br>><br>> (Half kidding. It would be great if all who work on aggregator stuff<br>> unify their efforts on such an API).<br><br>In the RSS & Aggregation group:<br><a href="http://groups.drupal.org/node/3528">
http://groups.drupal.org/node/3528</a><br><br>And coordination on core improvements:<br><a href="http://groups.drupal.org/node/3538">http://groups.drupal.org/node/3538</a><br><br>--<br>Boris Mann<br>Office 604-682-2889<br>
Skype borismann<br><a href="http://www.bryght.com">http://www.bryght.com</a><br></blockquote></div><br>