To put this distraction aside, PHP 5 is as readily available a hosting solution as PHP 4. Developers who want to use Drupal need to upgrade to PHP 5 rather than Drupal keeping pace with PHP 4.<br><br>As to aggregation, as long as a module is not allowing an XSS or an SQL injection attack. I see no need to try to accept feeds from sites that don't even put the effort in authoring feeds that meet the absolute minimal feed standards. Although some may like to aggregate the HTML content in a feed as is, how we could set in dealing with this case is open for debate. This is my opinion on the subject.
<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 6/20/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Morbus Iff</b> <<a href="mailto:email@example.com">firstname.lastname@example.org</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
> Did you waste the time to read a couple of threads before mine or did<br>> you have this reply tailor made a few days ago? The discussion was on<br>> weather to accept non-standard compliant RSS/RDF/ATOM feeds or not
<br>> sweety. And a little on weather to push for PHP 5 or not. So why don't<br>> you stick to that for a change?<br><br>You're kidding, right?<br><br>--<br>Morbus Iff ( damn you richards! i will have my revenge! )
<br>Technical: <a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/779">http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/779</a><br>Culture: <a href="http://www.disobey.com/">http://www.disobey.com/</a> and <a href="http://www.gamegrene.com/">http://www.gamegrene.com/
</a><br>aim: akaMorbus / skype: morbusiff / icq: 2927491 / <a href="http://jabber.org">jabber.org</a>: morbus<br></blockquote></div><br>