[drupal-docs] Style sheet

[Ron Mahon]

InterNet Marketing Resource Center
A Free Super Mart of Articles, Demos, Tutorials everything you need to
Succeed on the net.
www.inmrc.com 


-----Original Message-----
From: mystavash at animecards.org [mailto:mystavash at animecards.org] 
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 11:28 PM
To: drupal-docs at drupal.org
Subject: Re: [drupal-docs] Style sheet

Quoting Ron Mahon <ron at inmrc.com>:

> Anisa
> I was having trouble visualizing all the different suggestions so I 
> created a sample for further refinement.

Nifty.  :)  Just so people are aware, this is an example of a page about a
module that would be included in the handbook.

> Module File/directory Name:

Perhaps just module name?

> Version: (module version not drupal version)
> 
> Works with drupal versions: (4.5.+ 4.6.0)

We should probably make a distinction from core modules (which by definition
are distributed with the version of drupal they belong to) and contributed
modules.

I wonder if 'is available for Drupal Versions: x.x ' might be better.  A bit
fuzzy here.

> Purpose :( This module was designed to allow the easy installation of 
> new vocabulary's in to the normal menu) This could be copied to or 
> referenced in the help file.

Good idea!

> This module is not compatible with: ( )
> 
>  
> 
> Reason you should install: 

Hm, this can get vague.  Maybe 'example uses', or 'what this module does'?

> Screen shots: (Link)
> 
> Video: (link)
> 
>  
> 
> This module is dependent on: (Database Tables Name of, special cron 
> process
> etc.)

'requires' perhaps.  :)  Here we can also include any required modules (for
example, workflow requires actions).

> This module compliments (modules a, x, f)

Not sure on this...  what's an example of two modules that compliment each
other well?
When I was lost in they many choices of taxonomy menus. I thought there was
one that created the strings and one that displayed them? Not shore it was
ever so.




> It may be helpful if 5 or 6 people just try to fill it out for 
> different modules, and see where the problems are. I will do the 
> taxonomy menu if that's agreeable. I have this as a word file but I 
> don't think this list will take attachments. I will try if it's missing I
think of something else.

Sounds like a great idea!  Actual examples usually make things a lot
clearer.  :)

Anisa.