[drupal-docs] Docbook ++ question
Anisa
mystavash at animecards.org
Fri Apr 22 23:18:30 UTC 2005
*shrug*
Because some people think it's cool.
You can read more in the Drupal Docs archives.
Anisa.
vlado wrote:
>What is the aim of having the Drupal docs in Docbook?
>or
>What are the targets?
>
>1. Is it to provide easy to print PDFs?
>2. Is it to provide easy conversion to HTML, PS, LaTeX, many others?
>3. Is it to help authoring?
>4. Is it required to provide documentation in a bundle for offline
> reading?
>5. Have I missed some answers? possibly, yes
>
>There are a few related questions?
>
>How do the users prefer to have the documentation? What are their
>preferred ways of using the docs, or consulting them?
>
>I think starting from these questions will lead towards the format mix
>for the documentation.
>
>I have a feeling that using the book module on drupal is a good
>solution, but it lacks features. The tools for maintaining the book
>hierarchy and TOCs are there. There is revision control present. There
>is a shortage of output formats though.
>
>Is the current drupal book module good and comfortable to use to write
>and publish drupal docs?
>please answer this
>
>Why am I asking all of these questions. Well, if the answer to the last
>question is yes. I will volunteer to spend some time on
>producing an add-on to the book module, which will output proper
>docbook xml. Coming from me it is probably a tall promise, but I'll try
>to keep it. From there on, it will be a design matter. I'm not good at
>that unfortunately. At least not feeling comfortable with it.
>
>I'll try and produce template scripts for generating pdf, ps, standalone
>html from the docbook sources. Thsi will probably cover the cases for
>offline documentation. To even go that way, I need to be
>conviced that it will fit the requirements and the working habits of the
>documentation team. Otherwise I will be wasting my efforts and time.
>
>Cheers,
>Vlado
>
>
>
More information about the drupal-docs
mailing list