[drupal-docs] Transitioning to header-free book pages (was Re:
Styleguide)
Anisa
mystavash at animecards.org
Thu Apr 28 04:38:44 UTC 2005
Looks good to me. :)
I don't mean that in the sense that I agree headers are evil, but that
this is rather like how I would have reogranized that page anyway. ;)
Anisa.
puregin wrote:
>Hi Bryan/Doc people -
>
> I've tried to tackle the section you suggested to illustrate a
>proposed process
>for transitioning documentation from 'embedded header' format to
>a header-less format.
>
> I've posted the results on my site:
>
> http://www.puregin.org/node/127
>
>(I apologize for my somewhat broken attempt to 'improve'
>the themeing of book module. Sigh. Also, Konqueror seems
>broken on my CSS, and I've not dared try IE. Sigh again)
>
> There's three subsections, one for each of
>
> - the current structure
> - the transitional structure (embedded sections extracted as
>children)
> - a conformant structure (no embedded html header elements)
>
> My take on current structure:
> - section titles don't appear in navigation context - it hard
>to find context
> without reading a fairly long page, with potentially quite
>diverse content
> - there's too many headers, and levels of headers, which
>breaks up the
> text, without clarifying structure. For example, a section
>titled "What are
> blocks" isn't really necessary as the first subsection of a
>sections "Blocks".
>
> The transitional structure reveals structural problems with the
>original:
> - there are some sections now which have no content, only
>children.
> This begs for content to be 'pulled up'.
> - The hierarchy of sections is too deep
> - Structure is manifest (all headers are revealed in the
>navigation block)
> but somewhat redundant.
>
> My attempted 'conformant' rewrite attempts to remedy the issues
>above.
> - Structure is still manifest
> - By pulling content up and removing redundant structure, the
>structure
> supports the content
> - The hierarchy has been collapsed to three levels within
>'chapters'
> - Each node is shorter, and more focussed. There's nothing
>'below
> the fold' except in the examples subsections.
> - There's still lots of room for improvement :)
>
> Some notes I made the in the course of this:
>
> - it would be nice to have a 'make a copy of this book page'
> function which would make a copy as a sibling of the
> page being viewed.
>
> - I'm thinking that the user interface for viewing a book
>should
> present quite a different view than the editing view.
> I'm thinking something along the lines of a paged
> HTML view of the 'Printer friendly' output of the entire
> subtree being edited. If the navigation block could
> track the position within the book as one paged
> through the text, that would be very useful. (I'm
> thinking of something much like most PDF viewers)
> There's (at least) two simultaneous and valid
> models of what a book is - a writer/editor often
> thinks of the local hierarchical structure; while a
> reader probably more often sees the local
> linear structure.
>
> I'm looking forward to your feedback.
>
> Djun
>
>
>On 26 Apr 2005, at 6:38 AM, bryan kennedy wrote:
>
>
>
>>On Apr 26, 2005, at 7:35 AM, Dries Buytaert wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>I think I'm convinced ... maybe we should try not to use headers in
>>>book pages. As long the book's depth stays within the agreed range,
>>>I'm OK with the proposed work.
>>>
>>>
>>Okay I am still way confused about how this would work. I mean I
>>don't get how we will decrease the navigation depth with out making in
>>each subsection super "wide" while eliminating headers in the content
>>of the book pages.
>>
>>But I am totally willing to be convinced. Could someone take a stab
>>at describing how they would restructure this content (broken up into
>>two main header sections, five sub header sections) within the other
>>18 items below it. Please emphasize why this would be beneficial to
>>the user experience:
>>Blocks
>>http://drupal.org/node/17170
>>I am not trying to be obstinate I guess I just haven't seen any
>>examples of how this would work.
>>
>>I would also like to re-iterate my belief that we are building a
>>website, not a book. Yes, it would be awesome if we could take the
>>content from our website and do a book friendly output, but IMO the
>>people who want this are a minority audience (even if a majority of
>>devel on this list want it).
>>
>>bryan
>>
>>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://drupal3.drupal.org/pipermail/documentation/attachments/20050428/10ba3baf/attachment.htm
More information about the drupal-docs
mailing list