[documentation] Re: NEED CHANGE IN RSS OUTPUT
Morbus Iff
morbus at disobey.com
Thu Dec 1 18:33:38 UTC 2005
>> As a search engine *user*, I could give two shits about *who* wrote
>> something. What's important to me is *what that person has said*.
>> Authority or name recognition should not influence opinion. [1]
>
> That's the way you think of as a developer not as a user who is focused
No, read more carefully. That's how I think as a *search engine user* -
someone trying to find results. I'm not all developer, I'm also a lover.
When I'm looking for sexual positions, I could care less if a German,
transvestite, transient, or whomever has said it. I could care less if the
result comes from Wikipedia, BigDongsForU, or My Life As A Porn Star. I
care about the result, not the marketing - it's never about who said what.
If you know nothing about sexual positions, how are you gonna know that
the "Kama Sutra" is better than "Adam & Eve" when you've heard neither
name before? The marketing is wasted: it's the content that matters.
Absolutely nothing to do with development.
> on web-presence and/or brand recognition. As I said before, this should
> not be an either/or proposition. Drupal Users should have the ability to
> change this if they so wanted to. Who are you to impose your standards
> or lack thereof of usability on Drupal Users? You ought not be imposing,
> through your software development choices, your POV about usability.
As far as I can tell, webchick gave you an answer on the drupal.org
forums. That answer will work just fine for your needs.Anyone else who
searches through the forums will find it too. However, it will never get
into Drupal's RSS code, because Drupal has to care about the purported
standards of RSS, which say a site title goes in <channel><title> and an
item title goes into <item><title>. To break the standards to satisfy SEO,
especially one that isn't even in the wild (searched on technorati
lately?) would be premature and, in this particular case, certainly not
"pack leading".
> easy to use COMMUNITY platform. Your attitude in this comment --along
> with other core developers-- is alarming. You are telling your people,
> your community to fuck off, that you know better when you are at the
> same time telling them this software IS community? What kind of a mixed
BrOOokeeeEnnNn ReCcoOOorRrDdd.
> believe they know better than most of the top designers and usability
> experts then, hey, fine. But make it possible for people to switch to
Show me a top usability or designer folk that says, in black and white,
with hordes of yes-men agreeing, that the blog title should preface the
item title in an RSS feed. And maybe then you'll have a chance to sway me.
> And I still have not had my question answered.
Actually, you had it answered on November 23rd, on the forums. For a
mastah of the community process, you've not checked all avenues.
--
Morbus Iff ( you are nothing without your robot car, NOTHING! )
Culture: http://www.disobey.com/ and http://www.gamegrene.com/
O'Reilly Author, Weblog, Cook: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/779
icq: 2927491 / aim: akaMorbus / yahoo: morbus_iff / jabber.org: morbus
More information about the documentation
mailing list