[drupal-docs] Drupal vs Mambo

Kobus Myburgh ITBJDM at puknet.puk.ac.za
Fri Jul 29 19:23:20 UTC 2005


I think the best way to get the correct slogan would be to transfer the *message* originally intended by the word "plumbing" into different words, not the slogan itself. "Plumbing" as used in the Drupal context, as far as I understood it from the start is "the stuff that make a good CMS", just like "plumbing" could be considered as the stuff that "stop plumbing problems from happening if implemented right".

If you'd really want to change the slogan, I'd say, play around with synonyms, or a whole different analogy (not that I have any suggestions for that).

Community Plumbing was always good for me - it will be great for everyone who understands it in context. We must think of "solid steel, rust proof pipeworks in our plumbing system" instead of "ewwwww! I hate plumbers!". Our challenge as documentation team is to carry the correct message over, not necessarily by changing the slogan, but wording the text describing it so that there is no chance for people to think of "plumbing" in the wrong context.

Regards,

Kobus


>>> cel4145 at cyberdash.com 7/29/2005 9:06:40 PM >>>
Well, in answer to your objections, community management system is about 
managing community interaction. But community plumbing has similar flaws 
  and would fit right in with your critique below.

If it was me, I might even consider calling Drupal the "Social Software 
CMS."  But then we'd get into people doing what you did, inaccurately 
equating social software with social networking applications.

Morbus Iff wrote:
>> * "Community Management System"
> 
> Wow, I hate that phrase. I'm not running a social software (such as 
> Orkut) or a glorified forum (such that it's ONLY forums) nor is anyone 
> else I know using Drupal (besides perhaps that video upload site thing). 
> I'm running a *content* management system - I can run a Drupal site 
> without giving a damn about comments, forums, or outside contributions 
> (and, in fact, here's an example of one: http://cinema93.com/). People 
> will recognize the original term CMS as equivalent to "manager of 
> content" and immediately see the above as "manager of community" as 
> opposed to "community created cms", which I hope was your original 
> intent (if you actually did mean "manager of community", then holy crap, 
> I've had the wrong worldview of Drupal for years).
> 
-- 
[ drupal-docs | http://lists.drupal.org/listinfo/drupal-docs ]




More information about the drupal-docs mailing list