[drupal-docs] Using taxonomies to tag the Drupal documentation
Mark Leicester
mark.leicester at efurbishment.com
Wed Jun 1 14:41:12 UTC 2005
Hi Kieran,
I agree: in my case taxonomy was indeed a key reason to choose Drupal;
that, the underlying architecture, and the uncanny knack the Drupal
community has of meeting my module needs.
As you can guess from my post, I am very interested in the issues
associated with knowledge management in online communities -
particularly where the application of folksonomy and taxonomy is
concerned. I'd like to offer my time in the ways that you suggest
below; it's quite compatible with my efforts at
http://www.planetcocoon.com.
Regards,
Mark
On 31 May 2005, at 17:34, Kieran Lal wrote:
> On May 31, 2005, at 7:17 AM, Mark Leicester wrote:
>
>> I find the mailing list archives[4] difficult to mine
>> for information. It struck me that applying folksonomy to the mailing
>> list was a low cost, low energy, collaborative way of filing
>> information stored there. At the same time it made sense to let people
>> tag the rest of the content in the site too. To get the job done
>> quickly I used autowitch's awTags[5] modules. I'm watching the free
>> tagging implementation develop with interest; coupled with a
>> sprinkling
>> of Ajax I'm sure it'll be a killer.
>>
>> Ah yes, while I'm at it, a realisation I've had re. folksonomy is that
>> the keywords people choose to tag content with are likely the same
>> keywords they will type into Google. I've been monitoring Google
>> referrals, and then tagging content according to what people have
>> entered. For example, if I notice someone has arrived at our site via
>> the search term "cocoon databases", I will run off and tag all content
>> related to databases (found via internal search perhaps) with the word
>> "databases". The awTags module gives me a page titled "databases |
>> Planet Cocoon", filled with content that mentions databases. A nice
>> way
>> to indirectly give people what they want, and it seems to be good for
>> Google ranking...
>>
>
> I found this very interesting. We have been waiting to do this for
> while we gets some other projects off the ground. But it would make
> sense to me to have someone in charge of research for the
> documentation team. We need someone to do audience research, link
> research, search terms research, referral research. If it all ends up
> allowing us to better tag our content so be it. Taxonomy appears to
> be one of the deciding factors why people choose Drupal and yet we
> don't take advantage of it enough internally.
>
> Let's not divert existing resources, but if there is someone lurking
> who would be will to commit to do research or taxonomies/folksonomies
> please say 'Aye!'.
>
> Cheers,
> Kieran
>
> --
> [ drupal-docs | http://lists.drupal.org/listinfo/drupal-docs ]
More information about the drupal-docs
mailing list