[drupal-docs] Round 4 of documentation sprintAdmin help:merging
into the handbook
Ron Mahon
ron at inmrc.com
Fri May 27 12:25:25 UTC 2005
I agree as long as some email notice is sent to inform every one of the
change or update.
As perversely discussed
Ron
InterNet Marketing Resource Center
A Free Super Mart of Articles, Demos, Tutorials everything you need to
Succeed on the net.
www.inmrc.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Kobus Myburgh [mailto:ITBJDM at puknet.puk.ac.za]
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 4:07 AM
To: drupal-docs at drupal.org
Subject: Re: [drupal-docs] Round 4 of documentation sprintAdmin help:merging
into the handbook
What I read makes a lot of sense, but keeping track of all the tasks as they
are listed here on the mail becomes a bit tedious, and unmanageable,
especially if you're out of the office as much as I am.
Maybe we should think of maintaining the core of the ideas that were
discussed in one way or another? If you use, for example, a forum with
restricted access, where you can have content threaded (good!) and filtered
(as the forum topics are editable) (as opposed to non-threaded in your mail
client, or only threaded and not filtered with mailing list archives)
wouldn't it be easier to maintain?
The feasibility of this idea is highly into question, as I can't see a
single person weeding out irrelevant information from the mails and posting
them to the site, but, I would just like to hear some opinions and thoughts
about this.
Regards,
Kobus
>>> cel4145 at cyberdash.com 5/24/2005 9:17:08 PM >>>
This sounds like the beginning of an interesting proposal. But let's start
by forming a documentation team (two people as coordinators) to prepare a
proposal for reorganizing/reworking that entire section. Right now we have a
proposal based on the viewpoint of one; one main goal of the documentation
teams is to present to the larger community a proposal that represents the
viewpoints of two people.
Meanwhile, at this moment, the goal of Kieran's project is to move the
admin/help into the handbook and make sure that non-empty pages exist for
the links in the admin/help which connect to the handbook. The documentation
team can then decide on the best method for organizing the entire section at
a later time and move this pages again if they see fit. Otherwise, the
alternative is not to go forward with the admin/help integration for now
until a documentation team can put together a proposal for doing the entire
section and we can discuss it.
However, Kieran is willing to manage the move as part of an effort to get
the admin/help submitted into Drupal core. This is his main priority at the
moment. Since Kieran is prepared to do this now, and no one was forthcoming
in forming a documentation team in the last few days for restructuring this
section of the handbook, I made a decision to let him go forward with this
project since he's committed and has people willing to assist. I've been
assisting as well and would invite everyone else to join in.
So to reiterate, yes, these are interesting ideas. And two people can/should
form a documentation team to restructure this section of the book. But at
the moment, Kieran needs feedback based upon his goals.
Let's stay focused on the smaller picture now and save the bigger picture
for when we have at least two volunteers ready to move forward with the
larger project.
puregin wrote:
> I'm a little concerned about making the Administrator's guide
> even more confusing than it currently is.
>
> I'm thinking of the new admin help as being similar in spirit to
> Unix 'man pages', and I'm imagining collecting them all into something
> which would essentially be an appendix - used for reference.
>
> I think that the existing content is sometimes of this format,
> other times not. I think that this existing content can be
> coerced into more of a 'cookbook' format.
>
> Here's the current structure: I'm going to associate chapter
> numbers, to make discussion easier:
>
> Administrator's guide
> 1. Introduction
> 2. Installation
> 3. Configuration
> 4. Blocks
> 5. Drupal modules and features
> 6. Upgrading from previous versions
> 7. Migrating from other weblog software
> 8. Backups
> 9. Best practices
> 10. Troubleshooting FAQ
>
> I think of the Troubleshooting FAQ, Upgrading, and Migrating
> sections as appendices, because they would likely be read by only a
> subset of readers, and each of these sections stands alone.
>
> I'd like to see the Admin help become an appendix also.
> Existing Admin help documentation could be put into a 'Versions prior
> to 4.6' section of this appendix.
>
> I propose an organization something like this:
>
> Administrator's guide
> 1. Introduction
> 2. Installation
> 3. Configuration
> 4. Day-to-day administration
> ...
> Backups (was 8.)
> ...
> 5. Cookbook
> ...
> Best practices (was 9.)
> ...
> A1. Drupal modules quick-help
> Core
> Contrib
> Versions prior to 4.6
> A2. Upgrading from previous versions (was 6.)
> A3. Migrating from other weblog software (was 7.)
> A4. Troubleshooting FAQ (was 10.)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
[ drupal-docs | http://lists.drupal.org/listinfo/drupal-docs ]
More information about the drupal-docs
mailing list