[documentation] [Documentation feature] Proposal: How to get more people involved with documentation

[Angela Byron]

Charlie Lowe wrote:
> This is the current allowed list:
> 
> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <em> <strong> <code> <del> <blockquote>
> <q> <sub> <p> <br> <pre> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <a> <b> <u> <i>
> <sup>
> 
> Is there anything there that needs adding? We could discuss that
> possibility and the security risks. For the most part, I believe that
> these tags cover construction of 99% of the existing handbook.

<img> would be the big one, imo. There are security implications with
this, however... "web bugs" and those lovely JPEGs that crash Internet
Explorer and such. Oh and in-lining 400MB tiffs or stuff from goatse... :P

This is one of the reasons I brought up the idea of moving documentation
to a separate subdomain, so that it could be configured independently of
the main Drupal site. Though with all the link rot problems I'm not sure
it's a good idea...

Also, <table> <th> <tr> <td> wouldn't hurt. About the only nasty thing
you can do with these is forget to close one of them and mess up the
whole page, but someone can come in after you and fix it.

And you guys should be replying to the issue, dag nab it. ;)

-Angie