[documentation] High level handbook change proposal

Peter Wolanin pwolanin at gmail.com
Tue Sep 5 03:15:26 UTC 2006


It's certainly friendlier than the current handbook, and in that sense
I think it provides a useful model for reorganization.

I'm been wondering, also, about how to deal with the versioniing
issue.  There are already a few significant differences been versions
in terms of the average end-user (admin) experience:

1) 4.6 - install all your own tables, make all blocks by hand
2) 4.7-install core tables, but most contrib modules install tables
automatically, blocks per menu, some built-in block visibility
options.
3) 5.0-both core and contrib should install automatically (assuming
you can create the DB), additional block visibility options built in.

Also, the API and features are changing (more or less) between each of
these, and will probably change more in future releases.

Some sections of the Handbook only need to be kept up for the current
release (how to install, is it for me, etc.) others (theming, PHP
snippets, etc) may need to have sub-sctions for each release, or pages
where the differences between releases are accounted for.

-Peter

On 9/4/06, Michelle Cox <mcox at charter.net> wrote:
> I've been thinking for some time that the handbook needs simplifying. I've
> been with Drupal well over a year and I still feel overwhelmed when I look
> at the landing page. I've started putting my ideas into a book on my
> personal site. It's far, far from being finished, but it's at least the
> start of a good mockup of what I've got in my head. I'd love to get some
> feedback on the general direction I'm taking. Please don't get into things
> like what should/shouldn't be bold or whatever as I realize this isn't even
> remotely polished.
>
> http://shellmultimedia.com/node/2
>
> Thanks,
>
> Michelle
> --
> Pending work: http://drupal.org/project/issues/documentation/
> List archives: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/documentation/
>


More information about the documentation mailing list