[documentation] Needed: a system for improving the text in core

[O Govinda]

I like this suggestion. 

Cordially, 
O Govinda
www.jswami.info


Jim Li-2 wrote:
> 
> As a start, maybe we can have a new issue category named "document" or
> "text
> change", in addition to bug/feature request etc? This way, all "text
> change"
> issues can be easily filtered and picked up for review by documentation
> team
> or interested parties.
> 
> On 8/15/07, O Govinda <jswami at pamho.net> wrote:
>>
> 
>> What seems to be a problem is that when you post a fix or enhancement for
>> core text--whether as a message or a patch--your post lands in a pile of
>> issues attended to mainly be people whose expertise and interest lies in
>> code. Your post, therefore, is likely to get lost. . . . . 
>>
>> I do think. . . that the issue deserves some attention. Whatever the
>> workflow, a robust system for improving core text could help users a lot.
>>
>> Cordially,
>> O Govinda
>> www.jswami.info
>> --
> 
> 
> --
> Pending work: http://drupal.org/project/issues/documentation/
> List archives: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/documentation/
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Needed%3A-a-system-for-improving-the-text-in-core-tf4274312.html#a12276046
Sent from the Drupal - Doc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.