[documentation] What's wrong with "you"?
Robert Douglass
rob at robshouse.net
Mon Oct 29 06:14:46 UTC 2007
Apress encourages their authors to address the audience directly. There
is nothing wrong with the use of the word 'you'. It is a style. The doc
team could decide to write in 100% passive voice but it would make for
very dry and sometimes awkward documentation.
-Robert
O Govinda wrote:
> I've lately seen a few comments that speak favorably about ridding Drupal
> documentation of the word "you."
>
> I don't understand the reason for doing so. Perhaps there's some
> conversation I've missed.
>
> >From my point of view, "you" is one of the most exceedingly useful words for
> documentation in the entire English language.
>
> * It's simple, plain, and direct.
>
> * It's short--only one three-letter syllable.
>
> * It's gender neutral.
>
> * It's superbly personal and friendly.
>
> * Unlike "they," it never invites doubts about antecedents. ("When users
> modify these settings, they. . . " The users or the settings?)
>
> * It leads you naturally to write about what the *user* has to do rather
> than what a module does--and that's very good indeed for the user.
>
> * It leads you naturally to write in the active voice, rather than the
> passive, thereby avoiding one of the greatest killers of clarity known to
> the English tongue.
>
> Even legal contracts these days tend to replace the old clunky impersonal
> terms with the equally legal, and far more clear and friendly, "you." For
> example, from an IBM license:
>
> ------------------------
>
> As used in this End User License Agreement, "you" and "your" refers to the
> individual or entity that wishes to use the Software.
>
> 1. License. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, you are hereby granted.
> . .
>
> -------------------------
>
> I'd say that rather than trying to curb "you" for Drupal documentation, we
> should *promote* it.
>
> In short: I see nothing wrong with "you." I'm all for it. Or is there
> something wrong with *me*?
>
> Cordially,
> O Govinda
> www.jswami.info
>
More information about the documentation
mailing list