[documentation] 'Last updated' information on handbook pages?
Fernando P. García
fernando at develcuy.com
Thu Jun 5 16:29:45 UTC 2008
I don't agree to have Timestamp because is inaccurate, but I agree to have a
CCK field named: "Last update", with description like "Please modify this
field only if you updated this content, It does not concerns typos and
styling".
Blessings!
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Shai Gluskin <shai at content2zero.com> wrote:
> I agree with Nat and Meitar,
>
> That time stamp is a data point. From reading the NYTimes to Wikipedia to
> Drupal.org a reader is obligated to assess the value/limitations of any
> particular piece of information. I think it is paternalistic to keep
> information out of folks hands because of a possibility that some folks
> might misinterpret the meaning of it.
>
> Reasons not to show information:
> * causes usability problems by mucking up presentation or page clarity.
> * takes up valuable system resources like running an "expensive" query.
>
> As long as it passes these tests, I'd be in favor.
>
> Shai
>
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 5:08 AM, Nathaniel Catchpole <
> catch56 at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> I agree with Meitar. I don't think having recently updated timestamps on
>> out of date information is going to lull people into a false sense of
>> security - at least not compared to now, where they appear pretty much
>> timeless except for the version taxonomy.
>>
>> This came up specifically in the case of module comparisons - if I see
>> that a page comparing modules hasn't been updated for 6 months, then
>> hopefully it'll indicate that things might have changed since then and
>> encourage me to update it. At the moment, I have no idea either way unless I
>> check the revisions tab (and I rarely do this unless I'm about to archive a
>> page or make a big edit, hardly ever if I'm actually reading documentation).
>>
>> Also, if I see a page that hasn't been updated since 2006 or something,
>> then it's an extra bit of encouragement to jump in and fix it.
>>
>> Nat
>>
>> --
>> Pending work: http://drupal.org/project/issues/documentation/
>> List archives: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/documentation/
>>
>
>
> --
> Pending work: http://drupal.org/project/issues/documentation/
> List archives: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/documentation/
>
--
Fernando P. García, http://www.develcuy.com
Developer - Analista de Sistemas
+51 1 9 8991 7871, Mz. P Lt. 30 1et Urb. Pachacamac - VES, Lima - Perú
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/documentation/attachments/20080605/688faf7d/attachment.htm
More information about the documentation
mailing list