[documentation] Docs Team meetings/group was: Proposal for a "Contributing to Drupal" handbook section

[Jacob Roufa]

thursday night 5pm eastern in #drupal-docs on freenode irc



On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Mike Booth <mike at michaelfbooth.com> wrote:

> Uh oh. I apologize for accidentally opening up the mother of all ratholes!
> I just wanted to make sure that I was spamming the *right* list with my
> availability announcements. :)
> I have no actual opinion on where we should organize. This doc mailing
> list is just fine.
>
> And I think the idea of having occasional group chats, without the
> overhead of a strict schedule, is also just fine. I would encourage Jacob or
> add1sun to shout out a time for later this week, and I'll try to be there
> with whatever ham-handed advice I can come up with. Those who can't make it
> can always make the next one.
>
>   Mike B
>
>
> On Mar 18, 2008, at 12:42 PM, Jacob Roufa wrote:
>
> In suggesting this, I was going off of one persons input and my thinking
> immediately led me to assume something. Sorry if this was confusing. I do
> think it would be nice to have a regular time to meet up in IRC though. It
> is a lot of information to take in for multiple sources and I feel it would
> be beneficial to have some sort of organization in that which is why I
> suggested the set time every (other) week (or month)... However, I do think
> Addi's idea of determining a fresh time each month could be enough. All I
> need to know is when and I'll be there. I'm just grateful that I have the
> opportunity to help make a difference so thank you all for helping provide
> that experience!
>
> Jake
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Joel Farris <joelfarris at mac.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mar 17, 2008, at 8:16 PM, Addison Berry wrote:
> >
> > >> On Mar 17, 2008, at 11:10 PM, Steven Peck wrote:
> > >> Yet another groups page?  What's wrong with email list?
> > >
> > > Nothing really. I'm fine with the list, but there seems to be some
> > > interest in some other info dissemination/access and I figured I'd
> > > toss it out there. I'm not wedded to the idea - that's why I said I
> > > had mixed feelings. I'm not the hugest fan of g.d.o but it has its
> > > uses as well.
> > >
> > > - Addi
> >
> > I feel that we should keep the relevant docs discussion on this email
> > list, for if we don't, we're running the risk that stuff will get
> > discussed and ratified without ever having made it into the issue queue.
> >
> > That is a beast we should all be fearful of, cause the <glance at
> > sepeck>wiki-style</glance> editing of handbook pages only works if we
> > have concrete evidence of who's doing what to where. I know my limits,
> > and keeping up with IRC, Teh Q, and this email list is already taxing
> > enough.
> >
> > I'm not saying "no, don't do it!". I'm saying that if people do, I
> > won't be able to participate simply due to Time vs. Information
> > constraints.
> > --
> > Joel Farris
> > "Protection and captivity so often look the same."
> >   ** Robert Ludlum
> > --
> > Pending work: http://drupal.org/project/issues/documentation/
> > List archives: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/documentation/
> >
>
> --
> Pending work: http://drupal.org/project/issues/documentation/
> List archives: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/documentation/
>
>
>
> --
> Pending work: http://drupal.org/project/issues/documentation/
> List archives: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/documentation/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/documentation/attachments/20080318/d768ba52/attachment.htm