[documentation] Some thoughts

[Steve Dondley]

Lize wrote:

> We should follow Firefox and the modules that actually work go to the front.
> The ones that need thorough testing and/or documentation should be put into
> an "experimental" category: Not quite recommended but not quite DEV either.

Firefox gets in the neighborhood of $65 million per year to help
maintain that project. If memory serves me correctly, they have over
200 employees. Drupal has 0 employees and any money that does make its
way into the project gets injected sporadically and under no central
command.

So while your idea to create a "a system that would better identify
the non-user ready modules that need further testing and/or
documentation" is admirable, it won't happen without a large group of
volunteers.