[documentation] Improving help pages in D7
bdoesborg at gmail.com
bdoesborg at gmail.com
Fri Nov 13 17:53:13 UTC 2009
because i volunteered as well (during the paris doc sprints) i pledge
that i write at least 2
we might start off with something simple like the comment module so we
have an example that we can follow
boris
2009/11/13 <skessler at denverdataman.com>:
> I am new thro docs team but I can do a module or two.
> Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Dowling <pwdowling at yahoo.com>
> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:43:44
> To: A list for documentation writers<documentation at drupal.org>
> Subject: Re: [documentation] Improving help pages in D7
>
> I had volunteered on that issue I believe.
>
> Yes, I'd be happy to take two or three at least.
>
> - Peter (winston)
>
> On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 08:04 -0800, Jennifer Hodgdon wrote:
>> Hello Drupal Docsters,
>>
>> A couple of months back, arianek noticed some issues in the help text
>> for "node" in Drupal 7, and in conjunction with some other folks and
>> input and such, created a much better version of the help text, with
>> headers, formatting, etc. Issue: http://drupal.org/node/537828
>>
>> The patch was not committed, largely because webchick raised an
>> objection that this would make the help text for the node module quite
>> different from the (rather lame) other help text in Drupal. She
>> basically said she would only commit the improved help page if the doc
>> team committed to improving all the other core Drupal help texts in
>> the same manner. i.e. all or nothing!
>>
>> The deadline for UI text changes is December 1st, which is just 17
>> days away (and several days of that are holidays here in the US), if
>> we wanted to fix up all the help files. There are about 40 core
>> modules that would need this fixup, and one (node) has been done.
>>
>> So, here are the questions:
>>
>> a) Can we come to consensus quickly on a new standard for help docs,
>> and document it somewhere in the Handbook? [Note: I think this doc
>> belongs under: http://drupal.org/node/360052 (Standards, security, and
>> best practices, in the development guide).]
>>
>> b) Can we come up with enough people to divide and conquer the 40 core
>> modules, and rewrite all of their help text to conform to the new
>> standard, and get the patch reviewed, all by December 1st?
>>
>> I'll be on IRC #drupal-doc today as much as I can, if people want to
>> discuss there... or reply to this message.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jennifer
>>
>
> --
> Pending work: http://drupal.org/project/issues/documentation/
> List archives: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/documentation/
> --
> Pending work: http://drupal.org/project/issues/documentation/
> List archives: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/documentation/
>
--
boris
More information about the documentation
mailing list