[documentation] New Handbook Page for Review... And a More General Question

[Joshua Brauer]

Um... OK so I didn't read this correctly... The PHP issue isn't what it looked like at first glance....


Thanks,
Josh

--
Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/jbrauer

On Feb 1, 2010, at 6:01 PM, Joshua Brauer wrote:

> Any user with the permissions to post PHP code to your site has permissions much greater than 'administer content types'. In fact they can give themselves 'administer content types' permissions should they choose to.
> 
> I thought we had a policy against the credit links but maybe it's just been a discussion. In short, in my opinion, the credit links discourage others from editing pages as appropriate, clutter the page, and become a problem as to "at what point when I've edited the page should I remove those credit links from two years ago".
> 
> Thanks,
> Josh
> 
> --
> Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/jbrauer
> 
> On Feb 1, 2010, at 4:53 PM, Shai Gluskin wrote:
> 
>> A friend of mine (he's newish to Drupal, this is his first handbook page... go Laurance Rosenzweig @rosetwig) and I wrote a new handbook page for the Reference: snippets section called, "Managing a CCK allowed values list without granting 'administer content types' access."
>> 
>> It's at: http://drupal.org/node/701774
>> 
>> Three kinds of feedback would be appreciated:
>> Tell me there is a much easier way (I'm dreading this one... hope that is NULL)
>> Review the handbook page and make improvements (it's directly editable by all d.o. users as are other handbook pages).
>> Give feedback on the "credits" at the end. Laurance in writing it up listed our names as creators of the tutorial. That's pretty rare on handbook pages, isn't it? I'm wondering if that is a part of d.o. culture that might be worth changing. I understand that handbook pages evolve with their wiki style. But the revisions list preserves that. And module pages often have "originally written by" lines in them even as the new maintainer identifies him/herself. What do you think.
>> Best,
>> 
>> Shai
>> --
>> Pending work: http://drupal.org/project/issues/documentation/
>> List archives: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/documentation/
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/documentation/attachments/20100201/c361ae6a/attachment.html