[translations] A couple of untranslated strings in 5.x core

[Gabor Hojtsy]

Cog Rusty wrote:
> Ok then... For now, would the release packaging system accept to
> package an "other.po" file which does not have a corresponding
> "other.pot", so that a translation team can solve some of the problems
> which can be solved in this way? Preferably into the main po file, to
> keep the import operation simple for the user. Or should I file an
> issue?

You mean an 'other.po' for core translations? If you have an exact list 
of missing default string, we can add them in to the default templates, 
no need for an other.po file.

Gabor