[support] base_path

Larry Garfield larry at garfieldtech.com
Wed Mar 8 07:24:23 UTC 2006


I believe Ber's suggestion was to manually re-add the base tag to your theme 
and just put in whatever value it should have.  Poof, legacy links work again 
while new base_path() links ignore it.

On Tuesday 07 March 2006 08:43, Kobus Myburgh wrote:
> I honestly think this base_path thing is a disaster... I am seriously
> thinking about sticking with beta 4 until a solution is found, because it
> freaks beginner-coders like me out :-(
>
> Does anyone have a specific fix that works already? Including sites in sub
> folders? With existing static content? Written in a way that even *I* can
> understand? Please? :-(
>
> regards,
>
> Kobus

-- 
Larry Garfield			AIM: LOLG42
larry at garfieldtech.com		ICQ: 6817012

"If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of 
exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, 
which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to 
himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession 
of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it."  -- Thomas 
Jefferson


More information about the support mailing list