[support] base_path
Larry Garfield
larry at garfieldtech.com
Wed Mar 8 07:24:23 UTC 2006
I believe Ber's suggestion was to manually re-add the base tag to your theme
and just put in whatever value it should have. Poof, legacy links work again
while new base_path() links ignore it.
On Tuesday 07 March 2006 08:43, Kobus Myburgh wrote:
> I honestly think this base_path thing is a disaster... I am seriously
> thinking about sticking with beta 4 until a solution is found, because it
> freaks beginner-coders like me out :-(
>
> Does anyone have a specific fix that works already? Including sites in sub
> folders? With existing static content? Written in a way that even *I* can
> understand? Please? :-(
>
> regards,
>
> Kobus
--
Larry Garfield AIM: LOLG42
larry at garfieldtech.com ICQ: 6817012
"If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of
exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea,
which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to
himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession
of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it." -- Thomas
Jefferson
More information about the support
mailing list