[support] CPU usage

Steve Power steev at initsix.co.uk
Thu May 14 19:15:43 UTC 2009


heys, i didnt mean to offend.

For a dedicated server, you will be able to deliver a much better user
experience as the performance will deteriorate only in accordance with your
load which you can monitor and plan for.  On a shared host you are at the
mercy of a shared hosting company.  You prob dont need a dedicated host, can
get away with a good vps, but if you've got 30 users hammering the server
for 30 minutes then you have spikes to deal with, which was the bane of
web1.0.  there are more options to deal with this now like automating ec2
instances to come up and down dependant on demand, but they are nothing to
do with drupal.  they are infrastructure engineering issues, which is what i
was trying to say.

It seems to me that the performance issue is an infrastructure, not an
application, performance issue.

Sorry if i came across badly.  been up all day!

steev

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Daniel Carrera <
daniel.carrera at theingots.org> wrote:

> Steve Power wrote:
>
>> If you're servicing all the schools in kent, then maybe the figures are
>> real.
>>
>
> I'm not really. I don't know how many schools we have in Kent. For all I
> know, it could just be this one school. For one school, I would expect at
> *MOST* 100 simultaneous users, but more likely 30 (one classroom).
>
> How many HTTP connections would 30 kids using a website generate? I have no
> real sense of proportion here...
>
>
>  But tbh, you're barking up the wrong tree.  Dont take this the wrong way,
>> but you need to run this like a popular e-commerce site, not a hobby site.
>>
>
> We would not have moved to UH if we saw this as a hobby site. In any case,
> I do expect to scale up the service as our needs increase. I just would like
> to have a better understanding of what our needs actually are (e.g. is 500
> connections reasonable?).
>
>
>  If you have thousands of users then shared hosting is no longer
>> appropriate and just wont scale as their business model relies on lots of
>> inactive websites.
>>
>
> I think we have about 2,000 users on the Drupal site or so. The large
> majority are inactive. Would you guess that kind of site merits a dedicated
> server?
>
> As I've said earlier, UH does not over-sell their resources (e.g. disk
> space and bandwidth). So the comment about their business model, while not
> wrong, is less true for this particular host than you might think.
>
>   Even if you could move hosts,  its not really going help however you
>> configure Drupal as the problem seems to be at an edge traffic shaping
>> device. Thats only my opinion tho.
>>
>
> Thank you for sharing your thoughts.
>
> Daniel.
>
> --
> [ Drupal support list | http://lists.drupal.org/ ]
>



-- 
-- 
--
Steve Power
Principal Consultant
Mobile: +44 (0) 7747 027 243
Initsix Technology and Media
--
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090514/f8ce5271/attachment.htm>


More information about the support mailing list