[support] Very frustrated with feeds

[Jamie Holly]

The W3C feed validation service is saying the feed is valid. It's just 
giving recommendations. They are safe to ignore.

If you are going to be doing feeds with a lot of media, I would suggest 
running all your feeds through Feedburner and serving them from there. 
There is actually an option in there to have the iTunes/media tags added 
automatically, which is all done through Google. Even with them though, 
you will still get recommendations from the W3C.

Jamie Holly
http://www.intoxination.net
http://www.hollyit.net

On 6/26/2012 8:40 PM, Jim Ruby wrote:
> I for got to mention under  display I have rss and it looks like this:
>
> Field
> Weight
> Parent
> Label
> Format
> Body
> Weight for Body
> 0
> Label display for Body
> - None -
> Label display for Body
> Above
> Formatter for Body
> Default
> Archives
> Weight for Archives
> 1
> Label display for Archives
> - None -
> Label display for Archives
> Above
> Formatter for Archives
> RSS category
> file
> Weight for file
> 2
> Label display for file
> - None -
> Label display for file
> Above
> Formatter for file
> RSS enclosure
> Hidden
> No field is hidden.
> Save
>
> In the modules area I have the following enabled:
> RSS category
> 7.x-1.2
> Provides an RSS category field formatter for taxonomy term reference fields.
> Requires: Taxonomy (enabled), Options (enabled), Field (enabled), Field SQL
> storage
> (enabled)
> RSS creator
> 7.x-1.2
> Provides an RSS creator field formatter for text and user reference fields.
> Unchecked RSS date
> 7.x-1.2
> Provides an RSS date field formatter for date fields.
> Requires: Date (missing)
> RSS enclosure
> 7.x-1.2
> Provides an RSS enclosure field formatter for file, image and media fields.
> Requires: File (enabled), Field (enabled), Field SQL storage (enabled)
>
>
>