[support] FastCGI vs mod_php for Drupal

[Jamie Booth]

My personal experience is that fast cgi is much faster I've used in 
fairly big traffic sites, even a Godaddy one which runs php as fastcgi. 
There are a number of items that you cant use with fastcgi which 
promotes it's speed. For example, you can't use "upload progress". Other 
items you cannot use also promote to it's potential speed gains 
depending on site-resource needs.

*/Jamie Booth/
*
On 12/15/2014 01:34 PM, Keith Smith wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Any thoughts on FastCGI being less resource intensive than mod_php?
>
> Any reason not to use FastCGI on a server running a moderately large
> Drupal website with a decent amount of page views?
>
> Thanks in advance for any insight.
>
> Keith
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20141215/f29435f2/attachment.html