And this comment could get adressed too: <cite>Drupal. PHP. Very cool in general. Main weakness is the security concerns. It also lacks a version history of pages, which is something important to me personally.</cite> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-websites-list/2005-December/msg00010.... Morbus Iff wrote:
I don't have time to send a private note off to the thread starter (or, for that matter, to the list), but perhaps someone in consulting or development could address the thread at:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-websites-list/2005-December/thread.ht...
"We really need to move forward on selecting a CMS.
It is highly unlikely that we'll see a PHP solution selected. I've heard many calls for Drupal, but let's not count on it. In particular, if a PHP solution is chosen, we'll have to be very, very careful in picking it out, and we'll probably need to disable any more dangerous functionality. In the case of Drupal and many others, that would include XML-RPC."