+1 Sorry, if i've joined the conversation a bit too late. On 12/17/06, Boris Mann <boris@bryght.com> wrote:
On 12/17/06, inkfree press <inkfree@gmail.com> wrote:
(Note: Perhaps re-thiking the nature and purpose of, and therefore the on-server handling of, the sandbox space will also suggest some alternative end-user interface to the downloadable-accessible contents. If it does not make technical sense to provide end-user access through the current web interface, then perhaps some additional "public" flags could allow individual authors the choice to make certain content end-user
accessible.)
No. You're a "dev" if you can use CVS to access stuff. You're an "end user" if you click on links to download modules. The stuff there is "public" and anyone that knows CVS can go and go it
Many threads, all veering off target. I think we've got consensus that: * sandboxes should stick around * we'd like to be flexible about what's in there for community sharing, but policy needs updating * maybe they should move to a separate repo
-- Boris Mann Vancouver 778-896-2747 San Francisco 415-367-3595 Skype borismann http://www.bryght.com