On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Adrian Rossouw wrote:
On 20 Jan 2005, at 11:06 PM, Nedjo Rogers wrote:
Hence this set of concrete proposals. Their aim is to set out new, expanded roles for decision making, while ensuring that the current values of rigourous code evaluation and development are maintained.
I think it works as it is presently. And I don't think I am alone.
You are not.
The structure is similiar to the way the linux kernel is developed,
Indeed.
and I think we benefit from having Dries at the head.
Yep. :) As long as Dries thinks the current development model is viable (ie not too much work for him) I do not think we need to change anything. What we should maybe try to communicate to the outside world is how our development model works. But I think there already is a rather good page by Nedjo in the handbook. Cheers, Gerhard