13 Nov
2005
13 Nov
'05
3:42 p.m.
Jose A. Reyero wrote:
We don't really need a separate repository for each of these projects, but the ability to create branches. If we were using SVN, maybe - but right now using a seperate repository allows the use of SVN instead of CVS :)
That's more than just SVN is better than CVS ranting, in the early stages of projects where files often get renamed 'svn rename filename' is a lot easier than CVS. But point taken. Branches can be merged. Then again I guess you could have a vendor branch in the separate SVN repository and merge with that before creating the final patch. -- adrinux (aka Adrian Simmons) <http://adrinux.perlucida.com> e-mail <mailto:adrinux@gmail.com> AOL/Yahoo IM: perlucida, Microsoft: adrian@perlucida.com