27 Feb
2005
27 Feb
'05
7:48 a.m.
Eric Scouten wrote:
I was a maintainer of image.module for a while last fall. James showed me his version in October and I've been working with it since then. James' version is much cleaner and simpler than the current one. A strong +1 from me on replacing the existing image.module -- with the caveat that I haven't looked at his most recent version (with the adaptations for image.inc).
Follow up: Last night I converted one of my sites to James' latest image.module and the upgrade script worked flawlessly. I say the sooner the switchover happens, the better. -Eric