On Friday 05 January 2007 5:11 pm, Scott McLewin wrote:
Karoly Negyesi wrote:
fit. As said, functor came to my mind -- functor_load. Might be a bad idea. Do not know yet. It took me five years to get a good translation in Hungarian for the word
I get what you are after and agree that differentiation between hooks and whatever hook_load() is should be made.
*snip*
What about slight variations on either of these. func_load() or callout_load().
'func' as the prefix implies more of a function rather than an object representing a function. I'm tainted by a C++ background and may be in the minority in how I read 'functor' vs. 'func'.
I'm going to be completely evil and toss out method_load(), since that suite of whatever-they-are are effectively methods of a node object, just not using Class syntax.
If you want to further this discussion then give me reasons why your change is better than the current, nice, orthogonal system. I am not changing the system at all, just renaming stuff a little bit.
I like the current, nice, orthogonal system.
Scott
Me three! -- Larry Garfield AIM: LOLG42 larry@garfieldtech.com ICQ: 6817012 "If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it." -- Thomas Jefferson