Speaking of updating the FAQ or Handbook to include some clarifications related to impacts of GPL ... there is http:// drupal.org/node/53242 Ray On May 23, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Earnest Berry wrote:
Perhaps if/after a conclusion is made, a summary of this discussion should be placed on in the FAQ or Handbook, so that others can reference the "general accepted policy" regarding this subject? I know that it has come up a few times and it would be nice to have one document to refer and change/update as necessary; keep everyone on the same page.
-----Original Message----- From: development-bounces@drupal.org [mailto:development- bounces@drupal.org] On Behalf Of AjK Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 11:49 AM To: development@drupal.org; rob@robshouse.net Subject: RE: [development] Commercially oriented modules (was MicrosoftSQLServer)
Robert,
Let them worry about the ramifications of GPL; if they screw up we get more open source software =)
Thanks for clearing this up for me, personally at least. I'm a third party integrator and have no ties with the Nedstat system. As such I don't want to get either Drupal or Nedstat into murky waters as a third party. So it seems to me at least I won't be committing my module to avoid any further problems.
best regards --AjK