<joke> If all he sees on his tiny viewport is the search block, then I've gotten him to the most important thing right off the bat! </joke> Seriously, as I said, perhaps we could do secondary links in there, or maybe even the Drupal Logo {or some logo} Much in the way that digg.com does. On 9/28/06, Syscrusher <syscrusher@4th.com> wrote:
On Thursday 28 September 2006 12:09, inkfree press wrote:
"Syscrusher" wrote:
With regard to Trae's later comment that "we live in a 1024 pixel world", I totally agree with that statement.
We do not live in such a world. We live in a world where information is conveyed through a number of human senses. Vision -- and the viewing portal through which that vision is transacted -- is only one of these senses. There are no dimensional constraints even on that portion of "our world" where information is conveyed visually.
Okay, point taken. I meant "I agree with the implication that most desktop web browsers are using screens of >= 1024 pixels". I hadn't intended to start a thread on general philosophy of what it is to be human, but was thinking "world" within the narrow context of the previous discussion. Apologies for that.
I still say there is too much whitespace at the top of the page, even on my high-res screen. It would be even more so on inkree's "very tiny viewing portal, held in the palm of [the] hand."
Syscrusher
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Syscrusher (Scott Courtney) Drupal page: http://drupal.org/user/9184 syscrusher at 4th dot com Home page: http://4th.com/
-- Trae McCombs || http://occy.net/ Founder - Themes.org // Linux.com