Can I again suggest that the most pragmatic change would be to license core under "GPL 2.0 or any later version". Moving to only 3.0 would be a mistake, since there are contrib modules and other open source projects that may stay as GPL 2.0 only. -Peter On 9/8/07, Thomas Barregren <thomas@webbredaktoren.se> wrote: ...
I agree that we first of all should boot code that links to code and call functions and share data structures with another code which has a licnse not compatible with GPL. But we should of course not boot code that use another code using GPL compatible license (e.g. BSD, MIT and LGPL).
The second most important thing we can do is to use GPL v3 instead of GPL v2. By doing so, many more licenses, most notable Apache, is compatible with GPL.
...
Best regards, Thomas