7 Jun
2007
7 Jun
'07
8:31 p.m.
On Jun 7, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Khalid Baheyeldin wrote:
Maybe I just don't want the overhead?
That would be a neat thing to have.
i hope you don't take this the wrong way, but i don't think you grasp how {node_revisions} currently works. you get the overhead of the JOIN on {node_revisions} no matter what (though as David points out, this is mostly free, since we rarely/never try to WHERE or ORDER BY on things from {node_revisions}). the only overhead of this change is the extra rows in the {node_revisions} table, and the thread is already discussing interesting ways to limit/reduce *that* overhead for sites that care about such things. -derek