I'm slightly worried that 'reviewed and tested by the community' will have lower quality submissions than 'ready to be committed'. The problem with 'reviewed and tested by the community' is that people will set it to 'reviewed and tested by the community' after one review, whereas with 'ready to be committed', we typically had different people looking at a patch. Read: I think 'ready to committed' was perfectly fine and I don't understand why this was changed without my approval. After all, I'm the one reviewing and committing these patches. Also, why the 'by the community' part? Why not just 'reviewed and tested'? Please rename at least to 'reviewed and tested'. Everything we do is community-driven so 'by the community' is completely redundant. It seems to suggest that there is a non-community body as well. On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:18 AM, Karoly Negyesi <karoly@negyesi.net> wrote:
Hello world,
After Daniel F. Kudwien pointed at http://drupal.org/node/156637 (rename RTBC) in my other RTBC thread, the issue saw a flurry of activity and, much to my delight, I was able to rename this status to something which much better reflects what it actually is.
Thanks to:
* fajerstarter for the new name * webchick for rerolling my small patch to make the issue state accomodate the longer name. * hunmonk for commiting and applying it on drupal.org.
Enjoy!
Karoly Negyesi
-- Dries Buytaert :: http://buytaert.net/