-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Barregren schrieb:
Ashraf Amayreh skrev:
I really won't make it long, but with another person to give final decisions the RTBC queues would deplete faster, the workload on Dries would lessen, the patches going in to core would almost double, and everything will be swell for everyone.
To travesty Rob Landley at the Linux Kernel Mailing List: "A modest proposal -- We need a patch drupaller". This discussion reminds med about a very similar discussion in the Linux kernel community for more than five years ago. Maybe there is something to learn from that discussion and its outcome. See http://lkml.org/lkml/2002/1/28/83.
We've in effect already implemented a system such as the one proposed. A patch endorsed by people listed in MAINTAINERS.txt for their subsystem usually gets Dries' attention. Cheers, Gerhard -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGiMLUfg6TFvELooQRAtVwAKCaRYyCa1EdAXBsJcSudF9h21TecQCcCc1n fG/IrAREQ6JG9fhyvpHMhsA= =lXTZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----