-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Joshua D. Drake schrieb:
etc.. but I can say that the customers that we deal with are sticking with 5 precisely because of the concerns on this thread.
Realistically, nobody having a working D5 site and not planning a major overhaul will not update to D6 completely regardless of whether views/cck/panels/holy_grail for D6 is available or not. The question is whether new projects would use D5 or D6. Today, I advised somebody to go with D5. This was mainly because of the tight deadline (end of may). If he had said "end of June" I might have considered to go with D6 (D5 would still be safer). "end of July" would be a definite yes for D6. This would be about half half a year after D6 initially got released, that's not too bad. D6.0 was quite unusable for larger sites anyway due to some bugs relevant for performance. Cheers, Gerhard -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIGKtdfg6TFvELooQRAtp5AJ9gL/o29RyCwqnIpBBXW5JkQWcddgCfR9VB 8q5HQWPLE2dFMYq++kIHlQ0= =O6ED -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----