(Sending to list) You don't. Here it is http://drupal.org/project/Drupal%20project/cvs No CVS knowledge required. On 12/14/05, Robin Monks <devlinks@gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/14/05, Khalid B <kb@2bits.com> wrote:
Nothing wrong with them, as long as every one knows they are a moving target.
CVS is a nightly build. Beta 1 is supposed to be a snapshot in time, and hence should not change.
So, in essence, if one wants nightly builds, go for CVS, if you want a beta or release candidate then beta 1 it is (or rc when it comes out).
As I said, not everyone wants to deal with CVS.
Robin
On 12/14/05, Robin Monks <devlinks@gmail.com> wrote:
+1 for the sake of +1...
What's wrong with nightly tarballs?
Robin
On 12/14/05, James Walker <walkah@walkah.net > wrote:
On 12/14/05 7:52 AM, Tim Altman wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:30:22 +0100, Dries Buytaert <dries.buytaert@gmail.com> wrote:
On 14 Dec 2005, at 11:41, Bèr Kessels wrote: > I am confused, I assumed beta 1 was just following head, in other > words beta1 > == head.
beta 1 is a snapshot of HEAD, taken 1-2 weeks ago. It is not updated automatically, although I could set it up such that the beta gets repackaged on a daily basis. At the moment, beta 1 lacks a number of important fixes.
I'd prefer that TAR files always remain static snapshots and not update automatically. When we talk about 4.7 beta 1, we know what state the code is in. If it's a moving target, it's much harder to tell if something is a new problem or existed when the release was first created.
+1
-- James Walker :: http://walkah.net/ :: xmpp:walkah@walkah.net
-- Robin Monks, CSL Web Administrator robin@civicspacelabs.org
--
Robin Monks, CSL Web Administrator robin@civicspacelabs.org