15 Oct
2007
15 Oct
'07
3:15 p.m.
Quoting Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com>:
In some cases, certainly, they don't need a related name. (We don't need 50 modules named cck_foo.)
For namespace reasons alone I disagree. If package foo distributes two modules then they should be named foo_bar and foo_baz. Otherwise they need to be separate packages creating separate namespace for each package. Earnie -- http://for-my-kids.com/ -- http://give-me-an-offer.com/