12 May
2006
12 May
'06
12:26 a.m.
Adrian Rossouw wrote:
Perhaps unit tests will help us weed out the dodgy non-standard sql that sometimes gets used, and then we can add more supported db types to our stack? (without breaking our backs supporting them)
I suppose that's one benefit to coding for mysql (the lowest common denominator)
Except, mysql really isn't the lowest common denominator. They have a spate of non-standard SQL extensions that are widely and popularly used -- mostly due to history. It'd be nice to get folks to use more standard, portable SQL so that we could support more db types reliably. What's the method to get there? Unit tests? Dev documentation? An SQL audit before CVS commit? ..chrisxj