-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gerhard Killesreiter schrieb:
Augustin (Beginner) schrieb:
On Tuesday 03 July 2007 00:58, Dries Buytaert wrote:
On 02 Jul 2007, at 17:12, Augustin (Beginner) wrote:
Right now, the guy who registered two hours ago could bump any half- cooked patch onto Dries' lap. If the patch is obviously braindead, someone will mark it as 'code needs work'. For now, I want every one to be able to mark patches as RTBC. It's not because you haven't been around long enough, that you can't tell a good patch from a bad patch.
What I was proposing was one more way to help with the situation.
It is obvious that you three cannot cope with the work load: http://drupal.org/project/issues?page=3&projects=3060&states=14
I've just taken 5 minutes to
1) won't fix 2 issues for 4.6
2) set another patch to "needs work" since Dries didn't want to commit it as this.
and all of a sudden there are only 3 pages left...
The problem isn't so much that the core committers can't go through the many patches, the problem is that they are a bit shy to change status on stuff that doesn't belong there...
Forgot this: If all the people who have written on this list today would instead just have spent some time in the patch queue, Drupal would be better tomorrow... People seem to think that adding yet another status or whatever technical widget to the issue queue will make it magically dissolve itself. This won't happen, it takes simply time and _work_ to make it shorter. Cheers, Gerhard -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGiTXzfg6TFvELooQRAni9AJsEAUIIiPq1VXB8Droays2ycwWMJACaAoOs Az/gmslUiLb9tCec+Z5c3Sc= =oyy+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----