1) great work putting this together, kieran! 2) i think gary and dries's concerns about the phrasing of the original draft of the survey are right-on, overall. 3) kieran, sounds like you agree with many of them -- how about an updated draft of the survey for futher reviews/edits so we don't duplicate suggestions that have already been incorporated? 4) a minor nit-pick in one of your replies... On Aug 9, 2006, at 11:48 AM, Kieran Lal wrote:
What do you mean with "modules that don't include dependencies"?
Example: If you want sign-up module: you download a tarball. But the tarball doesn't contain the dependent event module. If you build sites professionally, the need to get each dependency is expensive.
as the current maintainer of signup.module, i must protest. ;) signup does *not* require or depend on event.module. you can "signup- enable" any node you want. certain features of signup conditionally happen if the thing you're signing up for *is* an event, but that's optional. ;) cheers, -derek (dww)