Re: [development] Download stats for October

On Nov 15, 2006, at 3:42 PM, Greg Knaddison - GVS wrote:

1. A module that had a 4.6 branch and has had work in HEAD for 4.7 but doesn't have a 4.7 branch. ... I'd be happy to hear other explanations for the disproportionate ratio between module/core downloads for CVS.

i think you've nailed it exactly. maintainers not doing the right thing with their HEAD. ;) -derek p.s. i wrote a whole section of a page about "strategies for using HEAD effectively" in the handbook, but d.o is moving racks right now, so the site is down and i can't find the link.