30 Mar
2006
30 Mar
'06
1:07 a.m.
On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 00:57 +0200, Adrian Rossouw wrote:
On 29 Mar 2006, at 11:02 PM, Jeff Eaton wrote:
Far better, IMO, to explore a more robust relationships system that *encompasses* taxonomy-style metadata and book-style relationships (as well as other stuff). There are a couple of projects along these lines already. If there's talk of revisiting something as fundamental as taxonomy, make the project worth the effort.
Welcome to the 'we need a generalised relationship API' club.
We're going to start putting together a newsletter.
at the very least we need cards.