15 Dec
2005
15 Dec
'05
11:11 p.m.
+1 for the sake of +1...
What's wrong with nightly tarballs?
If you download some ....-nightly.tgz then it is fine. If you download a ... x.y.z.tgz, then you are not going to think it is rebuilt periodically (with the same x.y.z suffix). The same goes for the beta suffix. I am also +1 on keeing the named tarballs static. We can have nightly tarballs as long as they are marked and named as such. Goba