Gabor Hojtsy schreef:
Suppose node.module handles all of the content types defined by node modules as today, and a new module is added that handles the administrator-defined content types. What should that module be called?
cck.module field.module type.module nodetype.module contenttype.module
I like the name 'content.module' or 'content-builder.module'..
Note that it is not possible to have a dash in a module name, since the module name should be included in the function names, and PHP does not allow for a dash to be in the function name. This is why quite a few modules use underscore.
Goba
Well, I know we have some guidelines about that.. But imo i think 'content-builder.module' is way much better than 'content_builder.module'.. Inside the code we should prefix the function offcourse with the '_' form, but in the filename we should use '-'.. it's nicer and reads easier for non-coders.. Stefan