19 Mar
2005
19 Mar
'05
8:48 p.m.
Bèr Kessels wrote:
Op zaterdag 19 maart 2005 07:23, schreef Dries Buytaert:
I proposed this a few months ago but many people voted against it. The reason being "workflow loss".
This remains an isseu, but IMO a really minor one. Peopel who have problems with workflow loss should either copy-n-rename story.module, or use flexinode.
Hmm, now that I think about it: abe we should have a copy-storymodule: A flexinode lite, that allows quick creation of story-like node types? Should be easy enough to code.
Regards, Bèr
I haven't looked at your module yet, but I'm all for it by its description. I think you could implement this copy-storymodule node as a "blog" node. This would help users transition from the old scheme to the new one. -Mark