On 27-Feb-05, at 1:48 AM, Eric Scouten wrote:
Eric Scouten wrote:
I was a maintainer of image.module for a while last fall. James showed me his version in October and I've been working with it since then. James' version is much cleaner and simpler than the current one. A strong +1 from me on replacing the existing image.module -- with the caveat that I haven't looked at his most recent version (with the adaptations for image.inc).
Follow up: Last night I converted one of my sites to James' latest image.module and the upgrade script worked flawlessly. I say the sooner the switchover happens, the better.
Glad to hear that, Eric. I'm eager to get some more "successful" reports for the upgrade script. But , yes the full intention is to have this be the 4.6 image.module. -- James Walker :: http://www.walkah.net/